<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscar predictions using search engine results?  Not very accurate!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeduck.com/2007/02/25/oscar-predictions-using-search-engine-results-not-very-accurate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/02/25/oscar-predictions-using-search-engine-results-not-very-accurate/</link>
	<description>Have Blog. Will Travel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhay</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/02/25/oscar-predictions-using-search-engine-results-not-very-accurate/#comment-20647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abhay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/oscar-predictions-using-search-engine-results-not-very-accurate/#comment-20647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arnaud is right. If you don&#039;t really evaluate the results further, it&#039;s just kitschy and amusing for about 10-15 minutes. I used your entry as an counterexample in my recent entry about another similar site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arnaud is right. If you don&#8217;t really evaluate the results further, it&#8217;s just kitschy and amusing for about 10-15 minutes. I used your entry as an counterexample in my recent entry about another similar site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnaud Fischer</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/02/25/oscar-predictions-using-search-engine-results-not-very-accurate/#comment-20459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arnaud Fischer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/oscar-predictions-using-search-engine-results-not-very-accurate/#comment-20459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe, nice reading your post. I actually had a similar idea, trying to see if social media online could predict the winner. I went the other way, though, looking at online sentiment analysis for each of the Best Pictures ... http://searchistheos.blogspot.com/2007/02/internet-buzz-and-oscars.html

there is way to much noise out there to get a good understanding of online buzz without spending more time digging into the comments at a more granular level using or not computational linguistic.

-arnaud]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, nice reading your post. I actually had a similar idea, trying to see if social media online could predict the winner. I went the other way, though, looking at online sentiment analysis for each of the Best Pictures &#8230; <a href="http://searchistheos.blogspot.com/2007/02/internet-buzz-and-oscars.html" rel="nofollow">http://searchistheos.blogspot.com/2007/02/internet-buzz-and-oscars.html</a></p>
<p>there is way to much noise out there to get a good understanding of online buzz without spending more time digging into the comments at a more granular level using or not computational linguistic.</p>
<p>-arnaud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Hudson Blog &#187; Kate Hudson February 25, 2007 11:05 pm</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/02/25/oscar-predictions-using-search-engine-results-not-very-accurate/#comment-20435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Hudson Blog &#187; Kate Hudson February 25, 2007 11:05 pm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/oscar-predictions-using-search-engine-results-not-very-accurate/#comment-20435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] grandmother Julia Kate Hudson, who sang at The Pleasant Gift Missionary Baptist Church at &#8230;Oscar predictions using search engine results? Not very accurate!? Kate Winslet 9077 Helen Mirren 5470 Meryl Streep 1155 Judi Dench 573. Actress in a support role. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] grandmother Julia Kate Hudson, who sang at The Pleasant Gift Missionary Baptist Church at &#8230;Oscar predictions using search engine results? Not very accurate!? Kate Winslet 9077 Helen Mirren 5470 Meryl Streep 1155 Judi Dench 573. Actress in a support role. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

