<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to Viacom: See YouTube in Court!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeduck.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/</link>
	<description>Have Blog. Will Travel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Google to Viacom: See YouTube in Court!&#160;by&#160;Zodx Web Media</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/#comment-28558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#160; Google to Viacom: See YouTube in Court!&#160;by&#160;Zodx Web Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/#comment-28558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Viacom&#8217;s Google suit may actually go to trial, though I think everybody is just blowing smoke right now with Viacom looking for a nice payoff and Google looking to minimize the payoff to keep within the 400 million they allocated in the YouTube sale to copyright infringement payoffs. Unless Google is lucky enough to get a [&#8230;] GooLink [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Viacom&#8217;s Google suit may actually go to trial, though I think everybody is just blowing smoke right now with Viacom looking for a nice payoff and Google looking to minimize the payoff to keep within the 400 million they allocated in the YouTube sale to copyright infringement payoffs. Unless Google is lucky enough to get a [&#8230;] GooLink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Web 2.0 adapter for Grandparents is needed.&#160;by&#160;Zodx Web Media</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/#comment-28552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#160; Web 2.0 adapter for Grandparents is needed.&#160;by&#160;Zodx Web Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/#comment-28552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Viacom&#8217;s Google suit may actually go to trial, though I think everybody is just blowing smoke right now with Viacom looking for a nice payoff and Google looking to minimize the payoff to keep within the 400 million they allocated in the YouTube sale to copyright infringement payoffs. Unless Google is lucky enough to get a [&#8230;] GooLink [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Viacom&#8217;s Google suit may actually go to trial, though I think everybody is just blowing smoke right now with Viacom looking for a nice payoff and Google looking to minimize the payoff to keep within the 400 million they allocated in the YouTube sale to copyright infringement payoffs. Unless Google is lucky enough to get a [&#8230;] GooLink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Adicto al Internet&#160;by&#160;Zodx Web Media</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/#comment-28545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#160; Adicto al Internet&#160;by&#160;Zodx Web Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/#comment-28545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Viacom&#8217;s Google suit may actually go to trial, though I think everybody is just blowing smoke right now with Viacom looking for a nice payoff and Google looking to minimize the payoff to keep within the 400 million they allocated in the YouTube sale to copyright infringement payoffs. Unless Google is lucky enough to get a [&#8230;] GooLink [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Viacom&#8217;s Google suit may actually go to trial, though I think everybody is just blowing smoke right now with Viacom looking for a nice payoff and Google looking to minimize the payoff to keep within the 400 million they allocated in the YouTube sale to copyright infringement payoffs. Unless Google is lucky enough to get a [&#8230;] GooLink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Black Holes = Worm Holes = Dimensional portals to new universe? Maybe?.&#160;by&#160;Zodx Web Media</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/#comment-28541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#160; Black Holes = Worm Holes = Dimensional portals to new universe? Maybe?.&#160;by&#160;Zodx Web Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/google-to-viacom-see-youtube-in-court/#comment-28541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Viacom&#8217;s Google suit may actually go to trial, though I think everybody is just blowing smoke right now with Viacom looking for a nice payoff and Google looking to minimize the payoff to keep within the 400 million they allocated in the YouTube sale to copyright infringement payoffs. Unless Google is lucky enough to get a [&#8230;] GooLink [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Viacom&#8217;s Google suit may actually go to trial, though I think everybody is just blowing smoke right now with Viacom looking for a nice payoff and Google looking to minimize the payoff to keep within the 400 million they allocated in the YouTube sale to copyright infringement payoffs. Unless Google is lucky enough to get a [&#8230;] GooLink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

