<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wagner Street Talent &#8211; roof and porch repairs almost done</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeduck.com/2007/05/23/wagner-street-talent-roof-and-porch-repairs-almost-done/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/05/23/wagner-street-talent-roof-and-porch-repairs-almost-done/</link>
	<description>Have Blog. Will Travel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeDuck</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/05/23/wagner-street-talent-roof-and-porch-repairs-almost-done/#comment-32559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 23:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/wagner-street-talent-roof-and-porch-repairs-almost-done/#comment-32559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both good suggestions Tommo.   I&#039;ve rejected the cheap pulldowns because the inside rooms will look pretty nice and that would diminish things for potential buyers, but I need to check into &quot;fancier&quot; versions of pulldowns.   That would save a LOT of space and time.

Circular would work well due to space limitations, but I think it is way out of historical context.  I&#039;m still struggling with the best way to remodel this place:  Full blown expensive (probably NO), vs moderate cost (or a lot more time), keeping it very close to the craftsman style tradition it was built with vs low cost quick and dirty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both good suggestions Tommo.   I&#8217;ve rejected the cheap pulldowns because the inside rooms will look pretty nice and that would diminish things for potential buyers, but I need to check into &#8220;fancier&#8221; versions of pulldowns.   That would save a LOT of space and time.</p>
<p>Circular would work well due to space limitations, but I think it is way out of historical context.  I&#8217;m still struggling with the best way to remodel this place:  Full blown expensive (probably NO), vs moderate cost (or a lot more time), keeping it very close to the craftsman style tradition it was built with vs low cost quick and dirty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommo</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/05/23/wagner-street-talent-roof-and-porch-repairs-almost-done/#comment-32516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tommo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/wagner-street-talent-roof-and-porch-repairs-almost-done/#comment-32516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you be thinking that this will become permanent space?  Otherwise a nice pull-down staircase seems appropriate.

Maybe a spiral staircase would work?  Not very arts and crafts, but it might fit where nothing else would.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you be thinking that this will become permanent space?  Otherwise a nice pull-down staircase seems appropriate.</p>
<p>Maybe a spiral staircase would work?  Not very arts and crafts, but it might fit where nothing else would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

