<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does offline advertising really work, or are you just stupid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeduck.com/2007/06/08/does-offline-advertising-really-work-or-are-you-just-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/06/08/does-offline-advertising-really-work-or-are-you-just-stupid/</link>
	<description>Have Blog. Will Travel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft&#8217;s Engagement Mapping &#8230; a quantum leap &#8230; in BS? &#171; Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/06/08/does-offline-advertising-really-work-or-are-you-just-stupid/#comment-74316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s Engagement Mapping &#8230; a quantum leap &#8230; in BS? &#171; Joe Duck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/does-offline-advertising-really-work-or-are-you-just-stupid/#comment-74316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] noted in many posts before how poorly advertisers track offline and even online advertising effectiveness, usually resorting to opportunisic reporting and explanations by their advertising [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noted in many posts before how poorly advertisers track offline and even online advertising effectiveness, usually resorting to opportunisic reporting and explanations by their advertising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does offline advertising really work, or are you just stupid? &#160;&#187;Technology News &#124; Venture Capital, Startups, Silicon Valley, Web 2.0 Tech</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2007/06/08/does-offline-advertising-really-work-or-are-you-just-stupid/#comment-35867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Does offline advertising really work, or are you just stupid? &#160;&#187;Technology News &#124; Venture Capital, Startups, Silicon Valley, Web 2.0 Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 20:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.wordpress.com/2007/06/08/does-offline-advertising-really-work-or-are-you-just-stupid/#comment-35867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source:Joe Duck If advertising worked as well as is commonly thought, there would far fewer advertising salespeople. I&#8217;m not saying in all cases &#8220;advertising does not work&#8221;, rather in *almost all cases* image advertising is not as cost effective as online marketing, and in *many* cases I&#8217;d suggest that offline advertising has a negative [&#8230;]        Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source:Joe Duck If advertising worked as well as is commonly thought, there would far fewer advertising salespeople. I&#8217;m not saying in all cases &#8220;advertising does not work&#8221;, rather in *almost all cases* image advertising is not as cost effective as online marketing, and in *many* cases I&#8217;d suggest that offline advertising has a negative [&#8230;]        Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

