<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your kids are not so smart after all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/</link>
	<description>Have Blog. Will Travel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: After joe &#124; Barkingboxers</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/#comment-121012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[After joe &#124; Barkingboxers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 00:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/#comment-121012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Your kids are not so smart after all &#171; Joe DuckComment by Joe Duck &#124; January 23, 2008 &#124; Reply &#8230; Joe Duck; Theme: Andreas04 by Andreas Viklund. Blog at WordPress.com. &#8230; Joe Duck &#8211; Travel and Technology&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Your kids are not so smart after all &#171; Joe DuckComment by Joe Duck | January 23, 2008 | Reply &#8230; Joe Duck; Theme: Andreas04 by Andreas Viklund. Blog at WordPress.com. &#8230; Joe Duck &#8211; Travel and Technology&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/#comment-72121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Duck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/#comment-72121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fools Gold that would be an interesting study (Twitter content).  I&#039;m guessing about half drivel, half techno observations.

Horatiox - I agree that the definition of &quot;creative&quot; has taken a lot of hits lately, and I think we&#039;ve only just begun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fools Gold that would be an interesting study (Twitter content).  I&#8217;m guessing about half drivel, half techno observations.</p>
<p>Horatiox &#8211; I agree that the definition of &#8220;creative&#8221; has taken a lot of hits lately, and I think we&#8217;ve only just begun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: horatiox</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/#comment-72052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[horatiox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/#comment-72052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;... the future of computing - a future that is *less*, not more intellectually sophisticated in terms of how people interact with the internet and with each other.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Unfortunately, you may be correct.  Much blog-speak tends to a lowest-common denominator sort of bar-room discussion: that can be perceived on the current political slam-fests on DailyKOS or one of its many spin-offs. Or the Fray. In addition to the incessant yelling matches and the insta-pundits,  there&#039;s a great deal of imagery, ads, malware, flash, and of course the porno aspect. 

I don&#039;t think Youtube helped matters too much: some spam-artistes take their latest embedding of a Monty python episode, for instance, to be some profoundly creative act.  
The Net needn&#039;t be a sort of cyber-arcade; the research and archiving aspects of the Internet for example will remain important, hopefully.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;&#8230; the future of computing &#8211; a future that is *less*, not more intellectually sophisticated in terms of how people interact with the internet and with each other.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Unfortunately, you may be correct.  Much blog-speak tends to a lowest-common denominator sort of bar-room discussion: that can be perceived on the current political slam-fests on DailyKOS or one of its many spin-offs. Or the Fray. In addition to the incessant yelling matches and the insta-pundits,  there&#8217;s a great deal of imagery, ads, malware, flash, and of course the porno aspect. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Youtube helped matters too much: some spam-artistes take their latest embedding of a Monty python episode, for instance, to be some profoundly creative act.<br />
The Net needn&#8217;t be a sort of cyber-arcade; the research and archiving aspects of the Internet for example will remain important, hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fools Gold</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/#comment-71974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fools Gold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/2008/01/18/your-kids-are-not-so-smart-after-all/#comment-71974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if the ultimate in this is not &#039;twitter&#039;ing? Has anyone logged someones &#039;twits&#039; and analyzed what percentage of them are informative, contemplative, reflective, analytical, or simple drivel?

Is there a difference between a female viewpoint of the internet &quot;everyone is here and we are all communicating&quot; and a male viewpoint of &quot;I want to know &#039;x&#039;&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the ultimate in this is not &#8216;twitter&#8217;ing? Has anyone logged someones &#8216;twits&#8217; and analyzed what percentage of them are informative, contemplative, reflective, analytical, or simple drivel?</p>
<p>Is there a difference between a female viewpoint of the internet &#8220;everyone is here and we are all communicating&#8221; and a male viewpoint of &#8220;I want to know &#8216;x&#8217;&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

