<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compete.com sale a champagne moment?  Not at ~8% per year return it&#8217;s not.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeduck.com/2008/03/03/1551/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeduck.com/2008/03/03/1551/</link>
	<description>Have Blog. Will Travel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: asdf</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2008/03/03/1551/#comment-76161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[asdf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/2008/03/03/1551/#comment-76161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[liquidation preference.

median_ VC fund returns = ~15%, compounded annually. upper quartile VC fund returns = 30%, compounded annually. top dog VC fund = measured in X, not %, compounded annually.

those numbers above don&#039;t support claims of VC returns being modest.

early stage IT is different from late stage life sciences.

deal data is absolutely not sketchy. funds must report to LPs. and there&#039;s oodles of data available to the greenest researcher.

take 5 deals in an average IT fund.. 1/5 deals = total loss, 2/5 deals = partial loss/break-even, 1/5 deals = moderate gain, 1 deals = blowout gain

success by definition is not typical.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>liquidation preference.</p>
<p>median_ VC fund returns = ~15%, compounded annually. upper quartile VC fund returns = 30%, compounded annually. top dog VC fund = measured in X, not %, compounded annually.</p>
<p>those numbers above don&#8217;t support claims of VC returns being modest.</p>
<p>early stage IT is different from late stage life sciences.</p>
<p>deal data is absolutely not sketchy. funds must report to LPs. and there&#8217;s oodles of data available to the greenest researcher.</p>
<p>take 5 deals in an average IT fund.. 1/5 deals = total loss, 2/5 deals = partial loss/break-even, 1/5 deals = moderate gain, 1 deals = blowout gain</p>
<p>success by definition is not typical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

