AP News Boycott is the News


There is a huge story brewing that covers the intersection of mainstream news and blogging. Associated Press (AP) decided to crack down on what they felt were copyright violations by blogs quoting AP stories. Spoof site “The Drudge Retort” is under legal fire from AP, and this has prompted action by other blogs that coudld become one of the most interesting developments in the history of blogging and news. AP has backed off somewhat from its initial reaction and is now offering guidelines for blogs using their stories, but this is too little too late in the eyes of many prominent bloggers.

The world’s top tech blog, TechCrunch, has called for support of the boycott of AP stories – telling bloggers to stop linking to AP stories until they change the new policy and stop threatening to sue blogs.

Here’s a somewhat different perspective from Jeff Jarvis who probably did more to get the ball rolling on this than anybody.   His concerns seem to be more that AP is hypocritical and opportunistic about copyright and linking.  I do like Jeff’s idea that the key metric for compliance with good practices in blogging and journalism should be a *link* to the original material along with reasonable other attribution.

Although the story is interesting from the perspective of the changing interpretations of fair use and copyright legalities, this also represents what I think is the first large scale test of the influence of blogging on mainstream news outlets. If the boycott catches on the effect on AP will be very interesting to watch, and probably costly enough for AP in terms of stunting traffic and incoming links that they will revise the policy very quickly. The big winner here will probably be Reuters which will see a huge swell in links from high authority blogs. This has the potential to have a very positive long term affect for Reuters, especially with respect to Google rankings for very valuable technology news terms but also for the Reuters site in general.

It will also be interesting to watch how AP covers the story of its own decisions. I need to read up more before forming an opinion on this but I’m guessing AP’s guidelines are not all that excessive or unreasonable, rather AP is just missing the point that the benefits to AP from new media news and blogs far outweigh the challenges they will face from copyright violations.

As usual the blogging community is quick to attack attackers without giving enough thought to their reasonable concerns about flagrant copyright violations with no attribution to original authors or sources. It would be nice if in conjunction with the AP story boycott bloggers would work *twice as hard* to give MORE attribution to original sources. I’ve found myself in disagreement about this with other blogs but I continue to think the solution is to make it standard form to provide a link to original material you reference in your blog. This was standard practice in the early days, but as links became the key currency of the web people stopped using them as much, and started using them more strategically.

About these ads

About JoeDuck

Internet Travel Guy, Father of 2, small town Oregon life. BS Botany from UW Madison Wisconsin, MS Social Sciences from Southern Oregon. Top interests outside of my family's well being are: Internet Technology, Online Travel, Globalization, China, Table Tennis, Real Estate, The Singularity.
This entry was posted in blogs, news, Web 2.0 and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to AP News Boycott is the News

  1. EPORIA says:

    So, they can quote others…but others can’t quote them? It will be interesting to see the effects the blogsphere has on traffic to their articles.

  2. Pingback: The AP might have a point on copyright, but they are blowing it with us.

  3. horatiox says:

    “””””It would be nice if in conjunction with the AP story boycott bloggers would work *twice as hard* to give MORE attribution to original sources.””””

    Without a steady regurgitation of news, factoids, buzz, many so-called bloggers would have nothing to say. As blog-land becomes more and more saturated, so does the redundant information, and the emotion, the hype, the defamation. Political-oriented blogs (or shall we say, political-parasite blogs) are perhaps the worst (as with these faux-liberal bozos). Fact-based empirical writing disappears and is replaced by a sort of HysteriaSpeak.

    While one might approve of intelligent bloggers eventually replacing mainstream, corporate journalism, one can understand some of the cynicism in regards to blogging and online writing. Again, the appalling writing seen on many political blogs (like KOS, or a dyslexic- KOS such as New Worlds) demonstrates the Lowest Common Denominator factor of much on-line writing. When bloggers continually stoop to the Sally Fields-style paranoid indignation (e.g., “conservatives [or liberals] are all closet-case serial murderers and fascists!!!”) one sort of misses a Safire, or at least Hitchens, and even AP, or some type of objective format.

  4. JoeDuck says:

    one can understand some of the cynicism in regards to blogging and online writing.

    Yes, bloggers generally fail to realize that cynicism is a two way street as is credibility. My biggest beef with the blogging community is the lack of introspection.

    Some (though not all) of the indignation over copyright enforcement is from the beneficiaries of lax copyright enforcement, which is now the rule. As Jeff Jarvis noted bloggers have NOT been held to normal legal standards. Now that there is money to be made and lost, look for a lot more legal confrontations. Even as rules are clarified and mostly rewritten (as I think they should be) the legal games have just begun.

  5. glenn says:

    Ah…copyrights, patents, etc…it is all obsolete now. We need a new approach to the issue – creating more and more laws and backlogs of legal disputes over this is just going to cost everyone a lot more money.

    We need to solve the issue at hand regarding all intellectual property.

    Funny how the AP wants to protect what they report but they don’t want to held accountable when what they report is wrong :)

    I think this issue goes both ways on that front – if you can protect what you report you should be held liable if it is wrong.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s