<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Science Scandal &#8211; will Paleo Dendrochronology survive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/</link>
	<description>Have Blog. Will Travel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-107159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-107159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe point #1 you can&#039;t definitely say that as a yes.  Now we understand there has been NO warming since 1995 for sure.

They admit the numbers are flawed and 100 years in a climate trend does not make for justification of everything Obama and UN want to do.  That would be like saying I am going to be everything I have in predicting the world series winner in 4040 AD based on the very first pitch of the first baseball game ever played.

It isn&#039;t science, it is BS.

Even if the climate is changing which it does on this planet it is normal part of much longer trends and certainly is more impacted by what is going on in your neighborhood than by man.  What a joke, what arrogance.

CO2 is not proven by a longshot as the man culprit.  This argument is far from settled and anyone in light of what has been exposed as far as the corrupt data collection, reporting and suppression of scientific debate that still thinks this is settled has to be smoking crack.

The truth will come out.

BTW...how come NONE of the things predicted in Al Gore&#039;s movie have come true?  Or were ever true?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe point #1 you can&#8217;t definitely say that as a yes.  Now we understand there has been NO warming since 1995 for sure.</p>
<p>They admit the numbers are flawed and 100 years in a climate trend does not make for justification of everything Obama and UN want to do.  That would be like saying I am going to be everything I have in predicting the world series winner in 4040 AD based on the very first pitch of the first baseball game ever played.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t science, it is BS.</p>
<p>Even if the climate is changing which it does on this planet it is normal part of much longer trends and certainly is more impacted by what is going on in your neighborhood than by man.  What a joke, what arrogance.</p>
<p>CO2 is not proven by a longshot as the man culprit.  This argument is far from settled and anyone in light of what has been exposed as far as the corrupt data collection, reporting and suppression of scientific debate that still thinks this is settled has to be smoking crack.</p>
<p>The truth will come out.</p>
<p>BTW&#8230;how come NONE of the things predicted in Al Gore&#8217;s movie have come true?  Or were ever true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-107158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-107158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course you won&#039;t it would mean you would have to admit that you have been duped and Al Gore was a criminal.

A lof of people felt like you do during the 1930&#039;s in Germany when all the scientists and academics were telling everyone there was an ayrian race, etc...it is no different than what they are doing today.

Take the scientific process...focus on potential outcome out of 100&#039;s, grab it, focus it...make it your agenda.

That isn&#039;t called science it is called ideology.  That is exactly what the Germans did and it is exactly what the CO2mmunists are doing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you won&#8217;t it would mean you would have to admit that you have been duped and Al Gore was a criminal.</p>
<p>A lof of people felt like you do during the 1930&#8242;s in Germany when all the scientists and academics were telling everyone there was an ayrian race, etc&#8230;it is no different than what they are doing today.</p>
<p>Take the scientific process&#8230;focus on potential outcome out of 100&#8242;s, grab it, focus it&#8230;make it your agenda.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t called science it is called ideology.  That is exactly what the Germans did and it is exactly what the CO2mmunists are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeDuck</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-107157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-107157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeDuck</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-107156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-107156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Glenn please riddle me these.  You keep posting extreme skeptic talking points which generally ignore the real talking points:

1. Has the earth warmed over the past 100 years?  If yes, why?  If no, are you nuts?

2. Does the increase in CO2 have any relationship whatsoever to warming?   You keep saying it does not, but this is completely well documented, intuitive, obvious.  The only reasonable skeptic question is &quot;does it have a *significant* relationship?   The answer to that is &quot;probably&quot; but not &quot;certainly&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Glenn please riddle me these.  You keep posting extreme skeptic talking points which generally ignore the real talking points:</p>
<p>1. Has the earth warmed over the past 100 years?  If yes, why?  If no, are you nuts?</p>
<p>2. Does the increase in CO2 have any relationship whatsoever to warming?   You keep saying it does not, but this is completely well documented, intuitive, obvious.  The only reasonable skeptic question is &#8220;does it have a *significant* relationship?   The answer to that is &#8220;probably&#8221; but not &#8220;certainly&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeDuck</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-107155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeDuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-107155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn I don&#039;t agree with most of what you&#039;ve said here (AGW is not a scam.  It is the best description to date of what we are observing in real world as the earth warms.  No big alarm over it though, which is the point &quot;skeptics&quot; should be making rather than challenging the long term thermometer data that makes both GW and AGW &quot;pretty clear&quot;.

However I give you huge credit for massive comment posting - much more work than I put into the original post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn I don&#8217;t agree with most of what you&#8217;ve said here (AGW is not a scam.  It is the best description to date of what we are observing in real world as the earth warms.  No big alarm over it though, which is the point &#8220;skeptics&#8221; should be making rather than challenging the long term thermometer data that makes both GW and AGW &#8220;pretty clear&#8221;.</p>
<p>However I give you huge credit for massive comment posting &#8211; much more work than I put into the original post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-107100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-107100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now the truth is finally coming.  There has been no warming since before 1995.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece


Joe will you know finally admist that AGW was a scam, the scientists and Al Gore knew it?  How many of these hoaxes do you fall for?  AGW, Obama, etc...you seem to be lock-stop with the kool-aid drinkers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the truth is finally coming.  There has been no warming since before 1995.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece</a></p>
<p>Joe will you know finally admist that AGW was a scam, the scientists and Al Gore knew it?  How many of these hoaxes do you fall for?  AGW, Obama, etc&#8230;you seem to be lock-stop with the kool-aid drinkers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-107014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-107014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More proof of just how wrong they are about global warming!

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who flies around on private planes so as to tell larger numbers of people how they must live their lives in order to save the planet, wrote a column last year on the lack of winter weather in Washington, D.C.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html#ixzz0erJfJ8Rf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More proof of just how wrong they are about global warming!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html</a></p>
<p>Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who flies around on private planes so as to tell larger numbers of people how they must live their lives in order to save the planet, wrote a column last year on the lack of winter weather in Washington, D.C.</p>
<p>Read more at the Washington Examiner: <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html#ixzz0erJfJ8Rf" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/RFK-79834057.html#ixzz0erJfJ8Rf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-106897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-106897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/leaked-emails-climate-jones-chinese

This just keeps getting better.  How they cannot prosecute these guys is just amazing!!!

Now the China data was no good.  Gee that pretty much wraps it up...ALL the major temperature groups they were using to prove global warming have been proven to be faked or just wrong.

How can anyone still believe this is as big a crisis as they have led us to believe?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/leaked-emails-climate-jones-chinese" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/leaked-emails-climate-jones-chinese</a></p>
<p>This just keeps getting better.  How they cannot prosecute these guys is just amazing!!!</p>
<p>Now the China data was no good.  Gee that pretty much wraps it up&#8230;ALL the major temperature groups they were using to prove global warming have been proven to be faked or just wrong.</p>
<p>How can anyone still believe this is as big a crisis as they have led us to believe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-106662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-106662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though the MSM is completely ignoring any of this...the climategate scandel is growing.

Why anyone would trust the UN/IPCC ever again is beyond me?

http://www.news-independent.com/the-global-warming-scandal-heats-up/

These people belong in a cell next to Madoff...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though the MSM is completely ignoring any of this&#8230;the climategate scandel is growing.</p>
<p>Why anyone would trust the UN/IPCC ever again is beyond me?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.news-independent.com/the-global-warming-scandal-heats-up/" rel="nofollow">http://www.news-independent.com/the-global-warming-scandal-heats-up/</a></p>
<p>These people belong in a cell next to Madoff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://joeduck.com/2009/11/20/climate-science-scandal-will-paleo-dendrochronology-survive/#comment-106406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeduck.com/?p=3424#comment-106406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/start.html

Great test...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/start.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/start.html</a></p>
<p>Great test&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

