Google: Typosquatting for dollars. 32,000,000 of them


Google is helping to monetize interenet search misspellings, a technique that is estimated to make them 32-50 million per year.   It has also brought them a lawsuit from Edelman, the massive advertising consultancy who has no less than Wal-Mart as a client.

The technique involved is called “typosquatting” and is simply web publishers taking advantage of the many internet mispellings and mishits on keyboards to place advertising for terms like “computors” or “Girmany” or “uPhone” (where the user has accidentally hit the u instead of the i)

A study estimated that monetizing these domains via adsense ads (Google’s revenue share ad service) puts an extra 32-50 million to Google’s bottom line.

I don’t find this objectionable but not clear on the details of the Edelman lawsuit.  I’m guessing they want Google to direct people to the best sites for those terms and not charge rather than send the user to an intermediate site.

Silicon Alley Insider reports

Advertisements

About JoeDuck

Internet Travel Guy, Father of 2, small town Oregon life. BS Botany from UW Madison Wisconsin, MS Social Sciences from Southern Oregon. Top interests outside of my family's well being are: Internet Technology, Online Travel, Globalization, China, Table Tennis, Real Estate, The Singularity.
This entry was posted in advertising, Google, internet and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Google: Typosquatting for dollars. 32,000,000 of them

  1. Metroknow says:

    I have absolutely nothing to add to this story other than the small world coincidence that I interviewed at Edelman in Portland yesterday. I know, completely useless information. Just sayin’. 🙂

  2. Joe Duck says:

    Hey, excellent Metroknow. I think that would be a fun place to work.

  3. FoolsGold says:

    Alot of search results seem to be annoying now rather than useful. Just reading the URL I find that the content is often a place I have no desire to visit. Often I see my rather scholarly search term returned bracketed by some very undesirable content and I wonder how Google is returning this hit on the first page?

    I’m unlikely to go to that site and if I do go there I am absolutely certain to never click on any ad, so how does the site-owner or Google ever make any money doing this?

    Search for ‘scholarly term’ and a URL in some exotic foreign country will be returned by Google but the ‘scholarly term’ is bracketed by ‘hot babes’ and ‘domain name sales’. Well, I am not going to waste my time going there but I wonder just how such a site gets such a high ranking from Google.

  4. clickmedium says:

    There’s a story on SinglePill.com that’s pretty interesting in relations to Google and Adsense. Check it out.

  5. Si complet ¨¦tait constamment comme a cette existence serait plus simple, total orient parfait, gamma blue 11s frais

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s