I’m getting mentally geared up for the coming week of Webmaster World. I’m hoping to blog the sessions I attend in some detail although the laptop has been acting up a bit and there’s no time to fix it now. If I’m really energetic I’ll post pix at Flickr same day.
Last week’s widgets conference in Silicon Valley would have been fun to attend but I’d just returned to Oregon from Startup Camp and my mom is already giving me a hard time about the Las Vegas trip tomorrow. I give her credit though for asking what does this trip add to your company’s bottom line? The obvious answer “Free microbrews and fried wings at the Google engineer event” won’t impress her, but there are some tough jobs that just need to be done!
However I think Widgets (aka Gadgets) are clearly where the web is going, and perhaps more interesting is that fact that I don’t think this is well understood by many “internet outsiders” yet, and poorly understood by many internet insiders.
The impact of Gadgets This will start to become clearer as Vista environments merge the browser, desktop, internet, and applications using gadgets for navigation, information, and advertising. Standard page view and website metrics will break down quickly and we’ll see that publishers will seek to promote even more cluttered, busy, and interactive gadget filled computer screens in an effort to boost revenues. The future isn’t pretty, but’s it’s sure going to be interesting.
I also need to add Niall Kennedy to the blogroll – he’s one of those folks you really need to pay attention to if you want to see where thing are going to be in a few years.
I don’t think the Pope is the best source of inspiration about how to structure the world but I certainly respect the fact that’s he’s sincerely interested in alleviating suffering and is a very sharp fellow. Here, the Pope has suggested we need major structural changes in the global economy to stem the tide of poverty.
My working assumption has been that globalization is, on balance, a hugely positive force as well as an inevitable one. In simple terms I believe this because as I travel and look around me it is the highly capitalistic and globalized environments of the USA and western democracies that provide for their people better than the “anti capitalistic, anti westers globalization” economies of Cuba, North Korea, etc.
Socialists suggest that our higher standards are a result of exploitation of the underdeveloped countries, but if this were true we’d tend to see a LOT more flow of goods and capital from, for example, Africa to the USA. In fact we see that Canada and Europe, Japan and China are the huge trading and economic partners of the USA rather than the suffering countries. In fact the striking thing about US interaction with the poor is that it’s non-existent rather than exploitative.
The Pope’s comments notwithstanding, clearly it seems we should be working to bring the poor into the globalization loop, rather than do things that might destabilize the capitalistic global goose that lays so many golden eggs.
We don’t have a crisis of economy, we have a crisis of indifference.