UPDATE: Ann's clever simulations indicate the odds are as stated on the show.
The TV Show "Deal or No Deal" appears to be a complex variation on the Monty Hall problem, but it's NOT. I'm deleting my earlier *failed logic* which was wrong.
Apparently Monty's intentions matter in the 3 door game as follows:
Contestant picks door – this door will NOT be opened.
THUS there are 3 possible ways for the remaining 2 doors to be opened:
In Monty Hall, he KNOWS where the prize is and always uncovers an empty door. However in a game where the host does NOT know and thus the prize CAN be uncovered, the game universe will EXCLUDE the Prize, Empty option. This exclusion changes the odds, with each remaining option having a 1/3 chance of happening = equal odds whether you switch or not.
Jeremy Zawodny is having trouble concentrating. I think he's speaking for a large and increasing number of people who suffer from the simply overwhelming and seemingly infinite amounts of information now available.
The barriers to massive amounts of information access approach zero in the online environment, a very different state of affairs than a mere 10 years ago when even simply answers required trips to stores or local libraries and good quality research on complicated or in-depth topics generally meant many trips to a university libary.
This is always a provocative notion. I hope the concentration problems mean we are not losing the tendency for good thinkers to spend long and reflective amounts of time solving complex problems when needed.
I'm still in the "pro technology" camp that says technology is far more likely to save us than bury us, but I'm not sure I'd want to debate that in light of the current state of global affairs and internet abuses and info overload.
If it wasn't a dispicably bad pun I'd suggest we have one of those open format conferences and call it "Concentration Camp"