Yahoo Maps “Go ahead, commercialize me”


Jeremy via the Yahoo Developer Blog clues us in that Yahoo has "lifted many of the restrictions associated with the Yahoo! Maps APIs. Until today, the APIs were available only for non-commercial use unless you applied for an exception. The concept of commercial and non-commercial has gone away and exceptions are no longer necessary in most cases".   [bolding and italics added by bold Italian Renaissance Artists]

Although I'm not surprised about this (Yahoo and Google reps at Mashup Camp in February were indicating that the future for API use was going to move  along these lines) I think it's superb and cool and a huge hat tip to Yahoo for, as usual, getting the big Web 2.0 picture right and right on.
The concept is echoed by Eric Schmidt at Google in his recent LA Times interview:
We don't do our own content. We get you to someone else's content faster. 

As a publisher I'm loving this.  Give me simple but robust tools and an advertising network and I'm happy to find content and work to create sites and share the revenues with those who manage the network and the APIs.

What is YOUR LIFE worth to the Dept of Transportation? About 2.7 Million.


This cost allocation study Notes that the EPA is willing to spend almost twice what the Dept of Transportation is willing to spend to keep YOU alive. The numbers seem old so there may be some adjustments, but interesting is this:

In policy and regulatory analyses, EPA uses a value of $4.8 million to represent the cost of a premature death. This value is the mean of estimates from 26 studies dating back to the mid 1970s that have attempted to place a value on the cost of premature deaths. Estimates from those studies range from $0.6 million to $13.5 million, reflecting the large uncertainties in trying to estimate the public's willingness to pay to avoid premature death.

The Department of Transportation has adopted a value of $2.7 million per premature death, based on a comprehensive 1991 study by the Urban Institute

People are reluctant to accept this type of "dollar valuation" analysis even though it's commonplace in legal settlements and is a VERY APPROPRIATE way to allocate public funds. Note that the 4.8 million dollars the EPA spends to save a life would save thousands of lives if spent in alternative ways. One can argue that the complexity of this type of analysis undermines the rationale behind using this "lives for dollars" game, but it's a weak argument. Yet even with this appropriate method of trying to allocate dollars to lives and then allocate them most effectively, we tend to apply funding in odd ways and squander billions due to political budgeting.

The Internet Open = news at the speed of enthusiasm


The French Open ended moments ago, and already the Wikipedia biography of winner  Rafael Nadal – aka "Raffy Boy" for those of us who don't know him – has been revised to reflect the win against Roger Federer.

This news items, like the big tech news items of today Scoble leaves microsoft which was accurately posted extensively at many blogs before conventional news outlets could even have hoped to find out, strongly indicates that the internet has the potential to react to breaking news more quickly, more accurately, and perhaps most importantly, *VERY CHEAPLY*.    Millions of potential reporters are out there, enthusiastically posting blog items or revising websites in response to what interests them.
Can all that info and energy come together in BBC style global network fashion?   Certainly it has not happened yet and BBC remains the best global news distribution network by far.  However it should not take long for news mashups to leverage the millions of online reporters who daily post tens of millions of online reports into a simply spectacular news resource.  

Although it may be too far ahead of it's time to succeed, I sure like like Newsvine, which I think gives us a good glimpse of the future of news, which dovetails nicely with the future of the internet, which dovetails nicely with … our future.

Scoble leaves Microsoft!


Robert Scoble, one of the world's most influential and well-known bloggers, is leaving Microsoft for startup podtech.net

It's not official until he announces it tomorrow at Vloggercon.com, but in typical blogOsphere fashion the news is out before it is news.    Looks like Robert notified a few folks who called a few others who posted about it and it'll be old news by the time he announces tomorrow.

I had a chance to talk briefly with Robert at the MIX06 conference and he's a great guy.  I'm very surprised that Microsoft allowed this to happen though I'm guessing it's because the corporate structure made it hard to reward him appropriately for his enormous contributions to Microsoft as one of their most prominent online spokespeople.    Also I'm guessing he was frustrated by the slow pace of change at MS. As such a well-connected guy I bet he wanted to jump into the excitement of Web 2.0.  Microsoft is missing much of the point of Web 2.0 as many have noted – in fact it they aren't careful Web 2.0 could kill Microsoft, and Scoble's departure is notable in that respect.   He was Mr 2.0 at Microsoft and now he's gone.

Microsoft's loss is Podtech's gain and I'll look forward to seeing Robert more often now that he's heading to Silicon Valley. 

Copenhagen Consensus


An alternative to many pseudoscientific approaches to addressing global needs is the Copenhagen Consensus which seeks to suggest spending priorities for major global development projects according to their return on investment. Note their focus on health issues like AIDS and Malaria rather than Global Warming. They see warming as problematic but too difficult and expensive to fix. I’d like to see advocates for Kyoto protocol compare the costs with alternative approaches, but they seem to avoid this approach. I’d argue this approach is a moral imperative. Spending limited resources in the wisest way should be of primary importance to us as we seek to address global problems.
“The problem with Kyoto-type emission reduction plans is that the marginal costs rise exponentially and the benefits, if there even are any, rise linearly. So no matter which angle you look at it carbon dioxide restrictions on even a modest scale use up more social resources than any benefits they generate.”

Ross McKitrick
University of Guelph in Ontario

Is Web Surfing Dying?


I'm still big on "web surfing" and prefer bouncing around from site to site to RSS feed readers and customized home pages like MyYahoo.

However, as information online continues to explode and as blog content replaces website content as the freshest and most interesting stuff online, I think we'll all be moving to a more structured environment for pulling in information. This won't stop our surfing but it will tend to reduce the time surfing and increase the focus on topics of interest to us. Interestingly, this may mean we'll be less inclined to bump into "new" ideas. On the upside it may allow more in depth analysis as we refine the niche sources to the best of class in our areas of expertise/interest and learn to organize the information and data associations in more effective ways.

I think these RSS vs Surfing developments may be more profound than most realize. At MIX06 it was clear that Microsoft was going to focus heavily on RSS feeds as a key online distribution tool. Yet it was striking to me how Bil Gates (who I respect) and MS in general seemed out of touch with the big news of Web 2.0. Tim O'Reilly and Tim Berners-Lee both are good at seeing the future and they seem to suggest there are profound changes in emphasis for the online world – a shift to community/collective intelligence/complex webs of interconnected dynamic data/ etc. This is not directly related to the future of surfing but will influence it greatly, and I think Web 2.0 may not be as compatible with "navigation via surfing" as the old web.

Travel Mashup Holy Grail


Hey, if I wasn't down with a sprained ankle I'd get to work on the ultimate travel mashup.   John asked for suggestions over at his excellent Web 2.0 resource site Programmable Web and I thought I'd throw this one out, which expands a lot on the "California Road Cams" mashups I'm hoping to have for Mashup Camp 2 coming in July.
 The Travel Holy Grail Mashup would harvest the spirit of Where 2.0 and some of Tim O'Reilly's very cool ideas. It would mash the following data in an easy to navigate interface:* City information from Wikipedia* Pictures of the city using the Flickr API * Road Cameras from state DOTs over Google Maps* Weather/traffic information from Yahoo Traffic* Geolocated blog content using the upcoming         technorati API and/or existing blog/map mashes.* Develop a system to allow drivers to use cell phones and onboard navigation devices to report accidents, weather, and road condition reports to a central web location which would standardize all the data and allow interfacing with any website.

Mr. and Mrs. Smith * *


Mr. and Mrs. Smith is a very missable film, but see it anyway to support Angelina Jolie who is one of the world's most dedicated poverty fighters.   Sure she's unconventional and downright weird in some ways, but she's probably done more to focus world attention on global poverty issues than all the Fox News anchors combined. 

Oh, the review?   This clever idea secret agents from different sides get married – is muddled by an underlying plot that is inaccessibly silly.   Spy Kids, with a similar idea, is actually a more intelligent and entertaining film than Mr. and Mrs. Smith.

Movie buffs will enjoy the Brad and Angelina chemistry which brought the world a top celebrity scandal, one of the world's wealthiest Namibian children, and pictures of that child worth 5 million to charity.

You Busy? Part II


Very simplified and rounded to full hour, here's how an average American age 18+ spends his/her 24 daily hours. (see the study in previous post for breakdowns by gender, employment, etc.)

Sleep: 8 hour
Personal Care: 1
Eating and Drinking: 1
Housework: 1
Food Prep: 1
Purchasing goods and services: 1
Caring for kids:2
Employment: 4
Television: 2
Socializing: 1
Other leisure & sport: 1
Not noted here: 1

Very interestingly email + phone + mail were only listed as 6 minutes daily in this 2004 study. TV time is probably getting replaced by computer time which hopefully will be separated out in the future studies.

You Busy?


FInally I've found the bomb of a resource to help determine the truth of my contention that everybody complaining so much about "being too busy with important stuff" tells you less about people doing necessary activities than about people choosing to do things they a) don't need to do and b) often do suboptimally and c) think are necessary when in fact they are simply preferences.

American Time Use Survey Summary
Technical information: (202) 691-6339 USDL 05-1766

               http://www.bls.gov/tus/

For release:  10:00 A.M. EDT
Media contact:                691-5902     Tuesday, September 20, 2005

AMERICAN TIME USE SURVEY--2004 RESULTS ANNOUNCED BY BLS

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) of the U.S. Department of Labor
reported today that in 2004:

--Employed persons worked 7.6 hours on average on the days that they
       worked.  They also worked longer hours on weekdays than on weekend
       days--7.9 versus 5.8 hours.

--On the days that both worked, employed men worked about an hour more
       than employed women--8.0 versus 7.2 hours.

--Married persons spent more time doing household activities than
       unmarried persons--2.1 versus 1.4 hours per day--and women, regard-
       less of marital status, spent more time doing these activities than
       men.

--On an average day, persons age 65 and over spent the most time--7.3
       hours--participating in leisure and sports activities of any age
       group; 35- to 44-year-olds spent the least time--4.2 hours.

This second annual release of ATUS data focuses on the time Americans
worked, did household activities, cared for household children, and par-
ticipated in leisure and sports activities in 2004.  This report also
includes new measures of time use by occupation, earnings, and marital
status.

ATUS data collection began in January 2003.  The survey is sponsored
by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau.
ATUS estimates for 2004 are based on interviews of about 14,000 individuals.
Respondents were interviewed only once and reported their activities for the
24-hour period from 4 a.m. on the day before the interview until 4 a.m. on
the day of the interview--their "diary day."  If respondents reported doing
more than one activity at a time, they were asked to identify which activity
was primary.  Except for secondary childcare, activities done simultaneously
with primary activities were not collected.  Activities were then grouped
into categories for analysis.  For a further description of the survey, see
the Technical Note.

- 2 -

"Average Day" Measures

"Average day" measures for the entire population provide a mechanism
for seeing the overall distribution of time allocation for society as a
whole.  The ATUS collects data about daily activities from all segments
of the population age 15 and over, including persons who are employed,
unemployed, or not in the labor force (such as students or retirees).
Data also are collected for both weekdays and weekends.  Thus, "average
day" measures developed for the entire population reflect the average
distribution of time across all persons and days.  Activity profiles
will differ based upon age, employment status, gender, and other charac-
teristics.  On an "average day" in 2004, persons in the U.S. age 15
and over slept about 8.6 hours, spent 5.2 hours doing leisure and sports
activities, worked for 3.7 hours, and spent 1.8 hours doing household
activities.  The remaining 4.7 hours were spent in a variety of other
activities, including eating and drinking, attending school, and shopping.
(See table 1.)  By comparison, persons employed full time who worked on an
average weekday spent 9.2 hours working, 7.5 hours sleeping, 3.0 hours
doing leisure and sports activities, and 0.9 hours doing household activ-
ities.  The remaining 3.4 hours were spent in other activities, such
as those described above.

Many activities typically are not done on a daily basis, and some activ-
ities only are done by a subset of the population.  For example, only
46 percent of all persons age 15 and over reported working on an average
day because some were not employed and others were employed but did not
work on their diary day.  For this reason, much of the analysis that
follows uses time-use estimates that are restricted to specific population
groups, such as employed persons or adults in households with children.

Working (by Employed Persons)

--Employed persons worked 7.6 hours on average on the days that they
       worked.  They also worked longer hours on weekdays than on weekend
       days--7.9 versus 5.8 hours.  (See table 4.)

--Many more people worked on weekdays than on weekend days.  About 83
       percent of employed persons worked on an average weekday, compared
       with 33 percent on an average weekend day.  (See table 4.)

--On the days both worked, employed men worked about an hour more than
       employed women.  The difference partly reflects women's greater like-
       lihood of working part time.  However, even among full-time workers
       (those usually working 35 hours or more per week), men worked slightly
       longer than women--8.3 versus 7.8 hours.  (See tables 4 and 6.)

--About 76 percent of persons employed in management, business, and
       financial operations occupations reported working on a given day--a
       greater share than those employed in any other occupation.  Ninety-two
       percent of people in these occupations worked on a given weekday and
       33 percent worked on a given weekend day or holiday.  (See table 5.)

--Employed women living with a child under age 6 spent about an hour
       less per day working than employed women living in households with
       older or with no children.  Among employed men, the time spent work-
       ing did not vary by age of youngest child.  (See table 8.)

Household Activities

--On an average day in 2004, 84 percent of women and 63 percent of men
       spent some time doing household activities, such as housework, cook-
       ing, lawn care, or financial and other household management.  (See
       table 1.)

--Women who reported doing household activities on the diary day spent
       2.7 hours on such activities while men spent 2.1 hours.  (See table 1.)

--Nineteen percent of men reported doing housework--such as cleaning or
       doing laundry--compared with 54 percent of women.  Thirty-five percent
       of men did food preparation or cleanup versus 66 percent of women.
       (See table 1.)

--For men and women, and overall, the amount of time spent doing
       household activities did not vary greatly by the presence or age of
       household children.  (See table 8.)

- 3 -

Care of Household Children (by Adults in Households with Children)

--In households with the youngest child under age 6, time spent provid-
       ing primary childcare averaged 2.7 hours for women and 1.2 hours for
       men.  Physical care, playing with children, and travel related to
       childcare accounted for most of the time spent in primary childcare
       activities.  (See table 9.)

--For adults living with children under age 6, women provided an average
       of 1.2 hours of physical care--such as bathing, dressing, or feeding a
       child--per day to household children, while men provided about one-
       third of this amount--0.4 hour (about 24 minutes).  (See table 9.)

--Adults living in households where the youngest child was under the age
       of 6 spent nearly three times as much time (1.8 hours) per day caring
       for and helping household children compared with adults living in house-
       holds where the youngest child was between the ages of 6 and 17.  This
       difference was somewhat greater for women than men.  (See table 8.)

--Among adults living with children under age 6, those who were not
       employed spent about 1 hour more per day caring for and helping
       household children than employed adults, 2.6 versus 1.6 hours.
       (See table 8.)

--Adults living in households with a child under age 6 spent 4.0 hours
       per day doing leisure and sports activities.  About half of this time
       also was spent providing childcare as a secondary activity.  That is,
       they had at least one child under age 13 in their care while doing
       leisure and sports activities.  (See tables 8 and 10.)

Leisure Activities

--On an average day in 2004, nearly everyone (96 percent) age 15 and over
       reported some sort of leisure or sports activity, such as watching TV,
       socializing, or exercising.  Including the small proportion of the pop-
       ulation that reported no leisure activities, men spent more time do-
       ing leisure activities (5.6 hours) than women (4.8 hours).  (See
       table 1.)

--Watching TV was the leisure activity that occupied the most time, ac-
       counting for about half of leisure time on average for both men and
       women.  Socializing, such as visiting with friends or attending or
       hosting social events, was the next most common leisure activity, ac-
       counting for about three-quarters of an hour per day for both sexes.
       (See table 1.)

--Men were more likely than women to participate in sports on any given
       day, 20 versus 15 percent.  Men also spent more time in sports activ-
       ities on the days they participated, 2.0 versus 1.3 hours.  (See
       table 1.)

--On average, individuals spent 33 percent more time (1.6 additional
       hours) in leisure and sports activities on weekend days than weekdays.
       The biggest proportional gain was in socializing time:  Individuals
       spent 92 percent more time socializing and communicating on weekend
       days than on weekdays.  In absolute terms, TV watching and socializ-
       ing and communicating each were about one-half hour per day greater
       on the weekends than on weekdays.  (See table 11.)

--Employed adults living in households without children (under age 18)
       engaged in leisure and sports activities for 4.5 hours, about 49 more
       minutes per day than employed adults living with a child under age 6.
       Half of their additional leisure time was spent watching TV.  (See
       table 8.)

--Among individuals age 25 and older, those with less than a high school
       diploma spent 1.8 more hours per day engaged in leisure and sports activ-
       ities than those who had earned a bachelor's degree or higher.  (See
       table 11.)

--Married women spent 4.5 hours per day participating in leisure and sports
       activities.  On average, this amounted to less leisure time than married
       men (0.6 hour less), unmarried women (0.8 hour), and unmarried men
       (1.7 hours).  (See table 11.)