My Cicarelli test of a few weeks ago, where I blogged about the top Technorati search term, sent a few hundred visits total over the two week period. It’s not clear they were “extra” visits though I think they were, but it would take more analysis than I want to do to determine if placing high for that term meant I was lower ranked for the more common technology themes you’d find on this blog.
Technorati still shows that very interesting imbalance between readers and writers. In fact I’m again hard pressed to explain many of these top searches without looking them up:
- Larry Craig- Congressman accused of having gay affairs
- Edelman- Wal-Mart’s Ad Agency accused of fake blogging
- In Vodka Non Ve… ?
- Barney and Baghdad – Tom Friedman on GW Bush in Iraq
- Torbe ?
- Youtube- Video sharing bought by Google
- Google- HEY everybody knows this one
- Video – Generic, presumably YouTube
- Internet Explorer – Microsoft. I’ve heard of them.
- Paginas Da Vida – ?
- Iraq – don’t go there
- Myspace-Social network extraordinaire
- Ipod- Apple’s Music Gadget
- Second Life- Virtual lives online, Congress may tax this online, somewhat nonexistent world.
- Project Runway. Heidi Klum’s fashion hit
Top Tags –
See, these technorati top tags (below) are really different from the searches, reflecting the tech emphasis of most bloggers. In fact I find that I tend to blog about tech stuff in great disproportion to things I find more interesting simply because that’s the most common theme in the blog community and the conferences I blog about. I’m reading and living that stuff more than, say, political stuff which in many ways is more intriguing.
Blogs and tech sort of “go together”. I’d like that to change.
Well, after about 10 requests at least I got a reply from DMOZ , the ironically named “Open Directory Project”. Usually requests to become an editor, or comments, or requests for site corrections or additions to this influential but seriously broken directory simply vanish or get scant treatment. At least this time somebody wrote to me:
“I politely request that you do not reapply”
The irony of DMOZ is that they so persistently fail to choose a course to fix the directory, now riddled with bad links, old links, and opportunistic editing. The fix would simply involve accepting more well qualified editor candidates combined with using a more transparent and more PLIGG/DIGG like approach to screening editors and sites (so they could process the huge volume of submissions and corrections effectively).
Yet DMOZ seems to spend much of their time just rejecting editors and defending the project. Over at WebmasterWorld I’ve seen threads with long, careful posts devoted to nothing other than persistent arguing about the merits of DMOZ’s frustratingly inefficient approaches. I’m guessing my posts over there critical of DMOZ’s glaring inadequacies are what got me nixed as an editor.
Would I be a competent Travel Editor for a subcategory of “Oregon Travel”? Seems reasonable given that I’ve worked in the online travel field for over 15 years, have extensive contacts and knowledge of the online landscape in Oregon, and have a Masters of Science in Social Sciences with extensive tourism and online research in my academic and professional background. Yet I’m informed by DMOZ that I’m not worthy because I have …. criticized their project.
The (unsigned) and bipolar reply to my request to be an editor:
Your willingness to volunteer is greatly appreciated and perhaps we will be
able to utilize your talent in the future.
The Open Directory Project
Thank you very much for your application and your interest in the ODP.
However, I feel that given the negative views you appear to have of the project, that this probably isn’t the right hobby for you.
I politely request that you do not reapply,
Kind Regards, [ the email was not signed]
It’s getting harder to be bullish on Yahoo even though I personally remain bullish on their long term prospects. Yahoo remains the number one website in the world, the number one video streaming site, and has the best and coolest picture posting community (Flickr). Yahoo has the best understanding and support for the new web aka “Web 2.0” and a robust developer network.
SO WHAT’S the PROBLEM YAHOO ?
Unfortunately for Yahoo and for shareholder me, Google and not Yahoo has been the overwhelming beneficiary of the swelling pots of online advertising money. Google’s contextual matching of websites and searches to advertisements has yielded better returns for publishers and advertisers, creating a very profitable win-win scenario that has made Google the hottest
advertising agency…whoops I mean technology company, in history.
Yahoo’s Panama was released yesterday and may help reduce the contextual matching advantage Google has enjoyed for years.
Wall Street doesn’t seem impressed so far, but what do they know anyway?